Unknown's avatar

“The Self-Emptying God” A Sermon on Philippians 2:1-13

SCRIPTURE READING: Philippians 2:1-13

“1 If, then, there is any comfort in Christ, any consolation from love, any partnership in the Spirit, any tender affection and sympathy,  2 make my joy complete: be of the same mind, having the same love, being in full accord and of one mind. 3 Do nothing from selfish ambition or empty conceit, but in humility regard others as better than yourselves. 4 Let each of you look not to your own interests but to the interests of others.  5 Let the same mind be in you that was in Christ Jesus,

6  who, though he existed in the form of God,

    did not regard equality with God

    as something to be grasped,

7  but emptied himself,

    taking the form of a slave,

    assuming human likeness.

    And being found in appearance as a human,

8      he humbled himself

    and became obedient to the point of death—

    even death on a cross.

9  Therefore God exalted him even more highly

    and gave him the name

    that is above every other name,

10  so that at the name given to Jesus

    every knee should bend,

    in heaven and on earth and under the earth,

11  and every tongue should confess

    that Jesus Christ is Lord,

    to the glory of God the Father.

12 Therefore, my beloved, just as you have always obeyed me, not only in my presence but much more now in my absence, work on your own salvation with fear and trembling,  13 for it is God who is at work in you, enabling you both to will and to work for his good pleasure.”

It’s good to be with you. I always love to preach here. You know me, and I know you. You love me, and I love you. What could go wrong?

As many of you know, I had a very bad fall the day before Easter almost six months ago. I fractured my skull in three places, and broke my neck in a couple places, And I put a big scare into my family, didn’t I? Yeah. I want to thank you all for the care, for your prayers, for the meal train, and for your love that surrounded me and my family these past months. My late mother would have said that my guardian angel was working overtime. I figure my room wasn’t ready. Anyway, here I am, and here you are, so let’s hear some good news.

Would you pray with me: May the words of my mouth and the meditations of our hearts be acceptable in your sight, O Lord, our rock and our Redeemer. Amen.

When Brent invited me to guest preach today, he told me what the reading was and I shared with him that Philippians 2:1-13 is a foundational reading for my Christian faith. 

Now, Brent is not on vacation; he’s at the Southern New England Conference of the United Church of Christ Annual Meeting, with John and Janet Canning, our delegates. And right about now he’s listening to The Rev. Dr. Senator Raphael Warnock preach. And you get to hear me. But Jimmy Carter told us long ago that life isn’t fair, so, you know. 

But anyway, Brent said this is the reading. And I thought, oh, that’s right in my wheelhouse.

Let me share a little background on the text, and then I will tell you why it is important for me. The whole reading is a series of encouragements from Paul to the church in Philippi, and admonitions about how to live the Christian life. He had founded this church in Philippi and had this very warm relationship with them. And the letter reflects this warmth and this sort of intimacy and love. He is writing to them from a Roman prison, but you wouldn’t know it from the tone of the letter. You’d think he’d just won the lottery. The church in Philippi had sent him a gift of money in prison by way of his friend Epaphroditus, who got there and gave him the money. And Paul sent this letter back to the church in Philippi with Epaphroditis. There was no postal system to speak of. (There actually was a postal system in the Roman Empire, but that’s neither here nor there.) But Epaphroditus brings this letter back, and we have the letter.

Embedded in the center of our passage is a poem, a beautiful poem about Christ, which most likely was a hymn that the Philippians would have known. Paul most likely did not write this hymn, but he’s quoting this hymn that they would have known.

You know how the words to hymns are sticky. You know what I’m talking about? You remember the words to hymns, but you don’t remember just texts from the Bible as well. Hymn texts are sticky. A good deal of what I know about the Christian faith I acquired from hymns, singing hymns in junior choir and senior choir. For example, there is more good Christology in “Hark the Herald Angels Sing” than in many a theological book. 

So this is a hymn. It’s a hymn about Christ’s humility, that though he was in human form he shared Divinity with God the Father. He did not consider it something to be exploited, or held on to, or grasped or gripped. But he gave it up. He emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, even dying a slave’s death on the cross. And it has this form where it kind of goes down to his death on a cross, and then there’s a “therefore.” Therefore his name is highly exalted. It’s a wonderful, wonderful hymn. I know it by heart (not in this translation).

I’ll tell you why that hymn is salient for me. I grew up in the church. I sang in the Junior and then in the Senior Choir. My Sunday School faith was a pretty simple moralistic dualism. If you’re good God is happy, and if you are not good God is displeased. “He sees you when you’re sleeping, he knows when you’re awake. He knows if you’ve been bad or good, so be good for goodness sake.”

When I was 15 my mother became ill with colon cancer, and when I was 18, after many years of suffering, she died, two weeks into my first semester of college. To say I was lost would be an understatement, but my Sunday School faith didn’t have much to offer really, and I really didn’t want to have too much to do with this god who took my mom, or at least allowed her to be taken. I know she didn’t abandon me, but you feel abandoned when you’re a kid and your parent dies.

It’s a long story from there to here, and I will spare you the details, but when I ended up in seminary and started to really think deeply about who this God was, I was drawn to Jesus as the crucified and forsaken one. God incarnate in his human form who has solidarity with all of us humans in all our suffering, our sense of abandonment, our sense of forsakenness, all the marginal people, the last, the least, and the lost. That was a God I could embrace. I went to seminary looking for answers, and when someone asks me if I found them, I say, “Not really, but I got better questions.”

And so, the cross and all it means became a theological preoccupation of mine through most of my ministry. I’m kind of a “Johnny one note.” It’s a good note, an important note. And I had three academic sabbaticals in Britain with my family, in 1989 at Oxford University, in 1995 at St. Andrews University in Scotland, and 2001 at Cambridge University in England. And I studied the subject of the cross and what it means, and I wrote a book about it. The title of my book is “When I Survey the Wondrous Cross: Reflections on the Atonement.” That title comes from the Isaac Watts hymn we will sing after the sermon.

Isaac Watts, by the way, was a Congregationalist. I don’t know if you knew that. When I was a kid, I thought he was an Episcopalian, because it always said Isaac Watts in the Episcopal hymnbook. But no, he was one of us. His English Puritan church sang only the psalms in meter. They were good Calvinists, and were kind of suspicious of music and things like that, dangerous stuff like music. And one day as a teenager, he came out of worship and complained to his father that the music was boring. That music was really boring. His father, as fathers would do, said, “Well, do you think you can do better?” And 756 hymns later, the answer is “yes,” he could and he did! Some of our favorite hymns: “Joy to the World,”“ When I Survey the Wondrous Cross,”“ Our God Our Help in Ages Past, ”“I Sing the Mighty Power of God,”“ My Shepherd Will Supply My Need, ”just to name a few.

So the cross, for me, is the symbol of God in his human form in Jesus Christ, being God with us. God With Us, in the whole smear of human existence, the whole struggle of being a human being in this life. He shared our humanity in all its fullness.

I was born at the very end of the middle of the Twentieth Century, which was the bloodiest and most brutal century in human history, though, sadly, we are on pace to set a new record. I came of age during the time of the assassinations in our country of John Kennedy and Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. and the war in Vietnam. It was the cross that led me back to the Christian faith as a young adult. Only Christian faith with a cross at its center was adequate to make sense of these tragedies of my early adulthood, and the brokenness and brutality of life in this world.

While I was in seminary a very important book came out: Jurgen Moltmann’s “The Crucified God.” Jurgen Moltmann was a German Reformed theologian. I still remember a question from the Introduction, “What does it mean to recall the God who was crucified in a society whose official creed is optimism, and which is knee deep in blood?” Pretty good question, huh?

In 1990, I was honored to meet Moltmann, and to be on a panel with him in Princeton, at the Center of Theological Inquiry. He told his story of being a German teenager at the end of World War 2 when the Germans were running out of troops, and they started enlisting old men and young boys to fight what was left of the war. I think he was 16 when he was enlisted to man an anti-aircraft battery, and he told of watching his other young teenage boy comrades being maimed and dying around him. And then when the war was over, the Allies took him prisoner and he went to a prisoner of war camp in England, where some good Christian gave him a King James Bible, which he read from cover to cover, and had a conversion experience, which I guess that’s one way to call it. He concluded that only a crucified God could help him make sense of what his country had been involved in, make sense of the manifold brutalities of the war and the European Holocaust. He became a Christian and one of the finest theologians of his time.

Now, the theme of Paul’s letter to the Philippians is humility.  I just read an article in the Atlantic about how there have been 3 or 4 recent books assaulting humility and compassion. “We’ve got to get rid of that. We’ve got to stop taking care of people. You know, it’s the welfare state.” Popular books. No compassion, no empathy, no humility.

But for Paul, his model was Christ, the self-emptying of God in Christ. The Greek word for self-emptying is kenosis. It means “relinquishing,” “giving up”, “handing over,” “letting go.” Opening your hands. It is contrasted with “grasping,” “clinging,” “holding on,” “gripping.”

There is a wonderful contrast hidden in plain sight in this little hymn in Philippians: Adam — did you know Adam is not a proper name, it means “human” in Hebrew. Adam, the first human – any grasping in that story? What did Adam grasp? The fruit. It wasn’t an apple. Apples don’t grow in the Middle East. It could have been a date or pomegranate. But it was a fruit, and he grasped it. Christ in the New Testament is often contrasted with Adam. Adam, the first human, and then Christ is the new human. So Adam, humans in our natural state are grasping, whereas Christ, the new Adam, the new human, isn’t grasping, but relinquishing, emptying, humble.

So, Paul’s admonitions to the Philippians are based on Christ’s humility. I need to say a word about humility in the ancient world. There are many lists of virtues in the New Testament that echo similar lists of virtues in pagan writings of the time. They are what we might expect: courage, honesty, strength, and the like. But notable in its absence is humility. It is hard for us to realize how radical the Gospel message of humility was at the time. A crucified messiah was on nobody’s bingo card. That Jesus chose humility, taking the form of a slave, even dying a slave’s death on a cross, was a scandal then, and it’s still a scandal.

Humility was not a virtue. The word virtue derives from the Latin “vir,” which means male. To be virtuous was to be manly. Humility was not considered a manly virtue. We men have a lot to answer for, really. But Jesus freely chose to humble himself and be an atoning sacrifice for the whole world. Somebody should tell hyper-Christian Pete Hegseth to have a closer reading of the Gospels as he touts his manly warrior-ethic version of Christianity. Perhaps he should start with the Letter to the Philippians. Or the Sermon on the Mount. Or the “Golden Rule.”

As some of you know, I am part of a wonderful Zoom Bible study that meets every Wednesday at 1:00. You are welcome to join us! The link is on our church website. Our group this week was a great help to me on Wednesday when I asked them what might this passage means for us as Christians today.

One person said that what Paul is describing here is exactly the opposite of the world we live in. Humility is still radical and still a scandal. Grasping, on the other hand, is widely accepted as the way to get ahead in our society. Rugged individualism is the American way, whereas Paul believes that faith is a team sport and takes place in community. Does anybody know where the Bible says, “God helps those who help themselves?” No. It’s not in the Bible. Who knows where that came from? How about ambition, competition, anything goes, dog eat dog. None of that is here. Paul, rather, admonishes them: “Do nothing from selfish ambition or empty conceit, but in humility regard others as better than yourselves. Let each of you look not to your own interests but to the interests of others.” Do we see a lot of that in our leaders and “successful” people? Do we see it in celebrities and famous people? Maybe Dolly Parton… Does the world we live in reflect the humility that Paul describes?

The late writer David Foster Wallace gave a now famous commencement speech at Kenyon College in 2005. He told this story: “There are these two young fish swimming along and they happen to meet an older fish swimming the other way, who nods at them and says “Morning, boys. How’s the water?” And the two young fish swim on for a bit, and then eventually one of them looks over at the other and goes “What the hell is water?”” Fish don’t see the water they swim in and we don’t see the socially-constructed world we take for granted, with all its assumptions about the way things are, and who’s in and who’s out, and who’s worthy and who’s not worthy, and who’s cool and who’s not cool. 

The people in Jesus’s day didn’t see the water they swam in either, which was the occupation of the Roman Empire, the most powerful empire in the history of the world at that time, which they kept in power in collaboration with the religious authorities in power. Power was maintained by violence and the threat of violence. Crucifixion was a slave’s death, reserved for those who threatened the power of Rome. One of the reasons the four Gospels are reticent about talking about Jesus’s crucifixion — this wasn’t Mel Gibson’s “Passion of the Christ” which goes into agonizing ongoing details of the death of Jesus. They were reticent about any details. And why do you think that is? Because everyone had seen a crucifixion. They knew what it was like. They didn’t need to be told. When there was a slave revolt the Romans would line the streets with dead and dying men hanging on crosses, sometimes thousands of them. It was a warning. It was “See that? You mess with Rome’s power and that’s what you end up with.”

Jesus’s death was a state execution. Does that happen today in our world? Sadly, it does. The extra- judicial killings of people in the Caribbean in small boats who may or may not be drug dealers, but we’ll never know because they don’t get due process, they don’t get their day in court. The administration decides they don’t like them, so they kill them. Or what we saw on TV, the murder of Renee Good and Alex Pretti  by ICE authorities in Minneapolis. Which we saw. We saw the video.

The alternative realm that Jesus proclaimed and embodied, that he called the kingdom of God, was a threat to those in power, and so they murdered him. And that was that.

Except it wasn’t! Because he didn’t stay dead, and his followers turned the world upside down by seeking a new world, seeking a better way, living a better way, a way of compassion, of empathy, of love, kindness and humility.

So, here’s Paul, moldering in a Roman prison writing to the church in Philippi, admonishing them to be loving as Jesus loved, and humble as Jesus was humble. Was this new way easy? No, it was not easy. Philippi was the capitol of Greek Macedonia and many Roman soldiers retired there. It was like the Berkshires, you know? So, the church was surrounded by fellow citizens who had sworn an oath to Caesar as Lord. The Greek is “kyrios,” the same word that Christians used to talk about Jesus. Jesus is Lord. So, there’s a conflict in values and culture. There was social tension and occasionally outbreaks of persecution for these Christians.

Still, Paul encourages them. He says, “Therefore, my beloved, just as you have always obeyed me, not only in my presence but much more now in my absence, work on your own salvation with fear and trembling, for it is God who is at work in you, enabling you both to will and to work for his good pleasure.”

Now, I have always been a bit intimidated by the phrase “work on your own salvation with fear and trembling,” but Paul softens it a little bit by saying “it is God who is at work in you, enabling you both to will and to work for his good pleasure.” I really like how the Message paraphrases these two verses: “What I’m getting at, friends, is that you should simply keep on doing what you’ve done from the beginning. When I was living among you, you lived in responsive obedience. Now that I’m separated from you, keep it up. Better yet, redouble your efforts. Be energetic in your life of salvation, reverent and sensitive before God. That energy is God’s energy, an energy deep within you, God himself willing and working at what will give him the most pleasure.” I like that energy, that vitality.

So imitating Christ should not scare us, it should not frighten us. It’s not the same as impersonating him. There is only one Jesus Christ, the Incarnate Word of God. Only one. His humility is the model for Christian humility. But we can imitate his humility. The way of Christ does not mean pulling yourself up by your spiritual bootstraps. It means walking together in community into the new and better way that Christ has begun among us. It means recognizing the water we swim in. It may mean changing the water we swim in. It means rejecting the fear that divides us and warns us off challenging unjust power and evil.

And the best Good News for today is that you are already in Christ by virtue of your baptism, and by your participation in the church, which is Christ’s body. You’re already in. Here you are, God’s beloved, worshipping and being the church by your very presence. So, just be who you already are! Love God, love your neighbor. And as Paul wrote to the little flock in Philippi, so long ago, “Be energetic in your life of salvation, reverent and sensitive before God. That energy is God’s energy, an energy deep within you, God himself willing and working at what will give him the most pleasure.” Amen.

“I preached this sermon on September 27, 2026 at the First Congregational Church of Stockbridge (UCC), Massachusetts. For the YouTube video go here: https://stockbridgeucc.org/sermons/the-self-emptying-god/?fbclid=IwY2xjawU0oZRleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBwZG9mAXNydGMGYXBwX2lkEDIyMjAzOTE3ODgyMDA4OTIAAR7PxH_0Nswq_aI-7G2Pz34PJl3HAFU7kyzWvpCmBErhTRuvR9bz1Q9MPdjpoQ_aem_9lV7HZDh2WsRXvhYPzuEZQ)

Unknown's avatar

“How then shall we speak of the atonement?” A Reflection for Good Friday

(This essay was first written in 1995 for my study of the atonement with Professor Richard Bauckham at St Andrews University in Scotland. It later appeared as a chapter in my book When I Survey the Wondrous Cross: Reflections on the Atonement. Some of the references, therefore, are dated.)

The Apostle Paul wrote to the Christians in Rome “God shows his love for us in that while we were yet sinners Christ died for us.” The death of Jesus Christ was understood by the earliest church, not least by Paul himself, as a divine act of reconciliation between God and humanity. Which is to say that Christ’s death on the cross was understood from the beginning as an atoning death. Continue reading →

Unknown's avatar

Awesome God: A Sermon for Trinity Sunday

Isaiah 6:1-8
Psalm 29

When I read today’s lessons, I am struck by the mystery, grandeur and majesty of the Biblical conception of God. In these lessons God is the One who is due reverence and worship by virtue of God’s very being and nature. Our God is an awesome God. Continue reading →

Unknown's avatar

“On Our Side!” A Devotional on the Atonement

Atonement“But if anyone does sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous; and he is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world.”
—1 John 2:1-2

When I was a child my siblings and I worshipped with our parents and went to Sunday school before worship. I don’t remember much about Sunday school, but I have many powerful recollections of worship.

We were Episcopalians and so worship was out of the old Book of Common Prayer, with its grand 16th century language, a good bit of which I didn’t understand. Nonetheless, my faith was shaped and formed by those words that washed over me from Sunday to Sunday.

The passage above from 1 John was often read in the service. I wasn’t exactly sure what the passage meant, but somehow I knew it meant Jesus was on my side, even amidst whatever sins might befall my little life. It was a comforting thought. Continue reading →

Unknown's avatar

My Book on the Atonement

CoverThe Christian doctrine of Atonement has long been a theological preoccupation of mine, which may seem strange since I didn’t come out of an Evangelical background, where this is a central concern.

I was blessed to have sabbaticals from the pastorate at three iconic British universities, Oxford, St Andrews, and Cambridge, where I read and wrote about this subject.

Out of those experiences came a number of journal articles and this book of essays. I have been heavily influenced by the thought of the British theologian P.T. Forsyth, and many of the chapters in this book focus on his theology.

The book was published in 2000 by Pickwick Press, which later became part of Wipf and Stock Publishers, who re-issued the book in 201o, for which I am grateful.  It is a humble little book that traces my attempt to come to grips with this vexing doctrine. It has an extraordinary foreword  by the estimable Gabriel Fackre, which I think alone makes the book worth having.

Wipf and Stock is currently having a 40% off sale until May 1, so if you are interested in obtaining this book, now is the time. You can go to the link here.

Unknown's avatar

“The God of the Far Off” Toward the Ministry of Inclusion

Prodigal sonWhat an extraordinary week this has been for our country! The great Swiss theologian Karl Barth liked to admonish the church that it must read both the Bible and the newspaper, because we Christians live in the world.

And what a week of news it was! There were two historic Supreme Court decisions that will change our national life in significant, and in my opinion, profoundly positive, ways.

On Thursday, by a 6-3 decision, the Court upheld the Affordable Care Act, which makes health care available to all Americans.

And on Friday, by a 5-4 decision, Marriage Equality became the law of the land.

The reason I am here before you instead of our pastor Brent Damrow is that he is in Cleveland at the General Synod of the United Church of Christ, representing the Massachusetts Conference. I am sure he will have stories to tell about the celebrations taking place there, as our national church has been a long and tireless advocate for equal rights for the LGBT community and a supporter  of marriage equality.

I believe that these two historic Supreme Court decisions share a common idea, and that is the idea of “inclusion.”

And a third extraordinary event in our national life also happened on Friday. President Obama climbed into the bully pulpit in Charleston, South Carolina to give the eulogy for the Honorable Reverend Clementa Pinckney, the pastor of the Emmanuel AME Church who, along with eight of his congregants, was murdered by a gunman while attending a Bible study at the church on June 17.

President Obama gave a stirring eulogy for Pastor Pinkney, but he was addressing not only those present, but also the nation. I’d like to share with you some excerpts of his eulogy:

The alleged killer could not imagine how the city of Charleston . . . .the state of South Carolina, how the United States of America would respond — not merely with revulsion at his evil act, but with big-hearted generosity and, more importantly, with a thoughtful introspection and self-examination that we so rarely see in public life.

Blinded by hatred, he (the alleged murderer) failed to comprehend what Reverend Pinckney so well understood — the power of God’s grace . . .

This whole week, I’ve been reflecting on this idea of grace . . .

According to the Christian tradition, grace is not earned. Grace is not merited. It’s not something we deserve. Rather, grace is the free and benevolent favor of God as manifested in the salvation of sinners and the bestowal of blessings. Grace.

As a nation, out of this terrible tragedy, God has visited grace upon us, for he has allowed us to see where we’ve been blind. He has given us the chance, where we’ve been lost, to find our best selves. We may not have earned it, this grace, with our rancor and complacency, and short-sightedness and fear of each other — but we got it all the same. He gave it to us anyway. He’s once more given us grace. But it is up to us now to make the most of it, to receive it with gratitude, and to prove ourselves worthy of this gift.

Martha and I were driving to Onota Lake in Pittsfield for a walk on Friday when the President’s eulogy came on the radio. We got to the parking lot at the boat ramp, but we didn’t get out of the car. We sat in the car until it was over, and when it was over I had tears streaming from my eyes.

The President was addressing the painful facts of racial relations in today’s America. He mentioned that in response to the massacre at the church the Confederate flag had been taken down in the South Carolina capitol and elsewhere. That flag, he said, was a symbol of our nation’s “original sin,” slavery.

The president had both the Bible and the newspaper in mind as he gave this incandescent speech. I don’t know of such a theologically astute presidential address since Abraham Lincoln’s second inaugural.

And once again I would argue that inclusion is the big idea that binds all these events together. Inclusion.

I believe in the power of ideas to shape societies, and, as my teacher, mentor and friend, Max Stackhouse taught me, to examine where they come from and what they mean. So I want to do a little bit of that with you today about the idea of inclusion. Continue reading →

Unknown's avatar

“The Cross and the Church: The Soteriology and Ecclesiology of P. T. Forsyth”

Forsyth(Note: This article first appeared in the Andover Newton Review in 1992 (Vol 3, No. 1). It is the fruit of essays I wrote for my tutor the Revd. Donald Norwood during my 1989 sabbatical at Mansfield College, Oxford. I want to thank Professor Max Stackhouse for inviting me to submit it. This is the first time it is available on the Internet. RLF)

Part 1 The Church and Our Redemption

 The British Congregationalist P. T. Forsyth, 1848-1921, is above all a theologian of the cross, and it is this soteriological focus that dominates his understanding of the church. The church was created by the saving work of Christ, and, therefore, for Forsyth, it has no other principle or foundation. Everything in, of and about the church is informed by the work of Christ; questions of polity, ecumenism, church and state, ethics, the ministry, the sacraments, all these are seen through the lens of Christ’s atonement. Since Forsyth’s view of the atonement is profoundly corporate and universal, so too his understanding of the church is corporate and universal. This understanding of a corporate and universal church created by a divine act in the atoning cross of Christ gives Forsyth’s theology a truly catholic and truly evangelical character and accounts for his continued appeal to several branches of the church as a significant ecumenical theologian for our time. Continue reading →

Unknown's avatar

“The Message of the Cross” A Sermon on 1 Corinthians 1:23-25

Iona crossA minister friend and mentor of mine, Herb Davis, once told me that every preacher has only one sermon in him, or her. According to Herb, every Sunday the preacher serves up that one sermon in a variety of ways. It may look like a different sermon, but at the heart of it, there’s just the one!

When I was growing up my family always had some sort of a roast at Sunday dinner, which was usually served in the middle of the day after we came home from church. Then the remains of that roast would reappear in various guises throughout the week. For example, let’s say it was a pork roast. The roast might reappear on Monday night in a soup, and on Tuesday night as my Dad’s signature roast pork chop suey and so on. So is that really the way it is? Do the people of God get fed leftovers every Sunday?

I hope not. I think what Herb was saying is that every preacher’s one basic sermon provides the core convictions out of which that preacher delivers the Gospel. And if Herb is right about the one-sermon theory, than I suppose today’s epistle lesson would have to be the text for my one sermon. Let’s hear it again: Paul writes, “We preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles, but to those that are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. For the foolishness of God is wiser than human wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger that human strength.” (I Corinthians 1: 23-25)

This is what Paul calls the message of the cross. Paul believed that Jesus was the Jewish Messiah and that God raised him from the dead. The cross on which Jesus had died became for him the symbol of that Good News of God’s vast unconditional love for all humankind. Paul believed that in Christ’s dying and rising two important new things had occurred. First, there was now a new age of God’ activity, and, secondly, there was now a new community, the church, made up of both Jews and Gentiles. Continue reading →

Unknown's avatar

Can the Church Survive the Decline in Worship?

KazMy Massachusetts colleague Kazimierz Bem, Pastor and Teacher of the First Church in Marlboro, doesn’t think so.

He had a wise and thoughtful post yesterday on faith street.com called Christianity Cannot Survive the Decline in Worship.

Here’s an excerpt:

The church is not made holy by the work it does — Protestants should understand that better than anyone. Rather, it is Jesus Christ and his cross that make us holy. Our service can never replace it, copy it, or perfect it. Our service can only be our response in gratitude for what God has done for us. As the great Congregational theologian Peter T. Forsyth once wrote: “The greatest product of the Church is not brotherly love but divine worship. And we shall never worship right nor serve right till we are more engrossed with our God than even with our worship, with His reality than our piety, with his Cross than with our service.”

For the whole article go here. I heartily recommend it. Kaz even quotes P.T. Forsyth. Well done!